lion2
01-08-2005, 06:28 PM
Im thinking that the PS3 might be big console. Just because they are using Nvidia for its GPU. Currently to get top performance Nvida has been making huge GPU's for PC, while ATI has been able to keep its GPU's roughly the same size.
The 30" Apple cinema display requires an Nvidia card that takes up two slots. ATI just created a card that works on that display that takes up only one slot.
Well the Xbox used mostly Nvidia components (Motherboard, Sound, NIC, GPU) and the PS3 I think is only going to use the GPU. Sony would most likely put a lot of pressure on Nvidia to keep the size small. I wonder how is that going to affect the chips power.
The xbox 2 will be using an ATI chip which would most likely at least make the GPU smaller. SIS will be doing the motherboard, and they have experience making those Mini PC's so they can probably produce a small motherboard. One thing that all the console will be using is a Power based processor, something like a G5. If you ever looked at the inside of an Apple motherboard you will see that those things take up a lot of space (mainly for is cooling). I wonder what techniques IBM is employing to keep sizes as small as possible. Anyone else has thoughts on this?
The 30" Apple cinema display requires an Nvidia card that takes up two slots. ATI just created a card that works on that display that takes up only one slot.
Well the Xbox used mostly Nvidia components (Motherboard, Sound, NIC, GPU) and the PS3 I think is only going to use the GPU. Sony would most likely put a lot of pressure on Nvidia to keep the size small. I wonder how is that going to affect the chips power.
The xbox 2 will be using an ATI chip which would most likely at least make the GPU smaller. SIS will be doing the motherboard, and they have experience making those Mini PC's so they can probably produce a small motherboard. One thing that all the console will be using is a Power based processor, something like a G5. If you ever looked at the inside of an Apple motherboard you will see that those things take up a lot of space (mainly for is cooling). I wonder what techniques IBM is employing to keep sizes as small as possible. Anyone else has thoughts on this?